Thursday, July 16, 2009

Philosophical Question For Today. . .

If a tree fell on TheWoodsofJordan, would he make a sound?

Let me give you a hint. He wouldn't understand this question.

The answer, of course, is no, he wouldn't make a sound. If it's not in the Bible, Jordan wouldn't know what sound to make.

TheWoodsofJordan is my YouTube toyboy. Not that kind of toyboy. My goodness, he would never allow that. He's saving himself for marriage. Heck, he doesn't even wank any more! No, Jordan is my toy to argue with when my brain is busy with something else. One doesn't need a brain to debate Jordan because he couldn't argue himself out of a wet paper Bible.

His arguments consist of repeating the same Bible verses over and over again. When he tries to think for himself, the arguments are even sillier than the Bible verses. He uses the Bible to argue that the Bible is true. He uses the Bible to argue that the Jesus story is true. He uses the Bible to argue that God is real. Circular reasoning anyone? When someone disagrees with him, well, that's because we're not true Christians and only true Christians can understand the Bible. It's over the heads of the rest of us apparently.

Jordan's latest religious phase is Calvinism. He's gone through many phases since I've been watching his videos. However, this is the weirdest one yet. He is seriously into evangelizing. He plans on making that his life's work. However, he truly believes in predestination. As he explains it, God has predestined His select people lucky enough to be saved by His Holy Wrathfulness and the rest of us will be sent to hell for eternity. We can do nothing to get ourselves saved. I have tried, along with other people, I've noticed, to explain to Jordan that predestination makes his evangelism job redundant; however, Jordan just doesn't get it.

He claims that he needs to continue to evangelize because he doesn't know who the "elect" are. But, it doesn't matter whether or not he knows. God knows and that's all that counts. God is supposed to be in charge of making sure that His elect will find their way to heaven, whether or not they have heard the wonderous preachings of TheWoodsofJordan. Hence, Pastor Jordan is out of a job. I think that, whenever he figures this out for himself, he'll give up the predestination lark. Of course, since Jordan doesn't think for himself, we'll have to wait until he reads it in another Christian document somewhere. And until that happens. . . .

Will we be able to see the forest for TheWoodsofJordan? :-)

Sunday, June 7, 2009

“Assassination Should be the Last Resort to a Discussion”

Okay, it’s been a while, but I’ve come across a doozy of a video on YouTube. This commentary is brought to us by Pastor Michael Salman from Harvest Christian Fellowship, aka YouTube ID harvest 777123, aka YouTube ID kryptologos, in his video entitled The Death of Abortionist George Tiller.

Leaving out pieces that are not necessary to what I have to say, Pastor Mike’s commentary is as follows:

“We want to give our condolences, our true, true condolences to the family of George Tiller. And with that, we’d also like to also give our condolences to the family of Saddam Hussein, and our condolences to the family of Hitler. And I don’t say this with condescending attitude …. I believe assassination should be the last, the last resort to a discussion. . . If we, as Christians truly, truly believe that abortion is murder of a baby, if we really believe that, then we must also put George Tiller as a mass murder. [Hence his condolences to the families of Hussein and Hitler]

“We don’t believe in murder, but we do believe in killing and, I think, in this case, it wasn’t murder as much as it was killing [and the difference would be…?]. Scott Roeder was one of the only people who really, really believed that what George Tiller was doing was murder, and he didn’t just sit there and twiddle his thumbs. He actually went out there and killed the guy who was killing babies. [Apparently, vigilantism is okay. So, if I really, really believe that fundamentalists are dangerous and should be annihilated, it would be okay for me to kill them as I come across them, Pastor Mike?]

“We give our condolences to the family of Scott Roeder who has to now suffer because he did what he really believed. Scott Roeder had no choice. He had his convictions; he had his faith; he understood and he believed what was going on here, and he had no choice but to act upon his true beliefs. It’s sad that death had to occur and there always should be an alternative, rather than assassination, but in some cases we’re left with no choice, or Scot Roeder was left with no choice. Many people have a higher tolerance level and are long suffering. In this case, Scott Roeder did not. He could not handle any more and his convictions brought him to do what he needed to do. On the day of judgement, I believe that Scott Roeder will be saved. George Tiller is going to burn in hell because he is a wicked man, a man who practises sin. The Bible is truth and all man is a liar [sic]. The Bible says that the ones that practice lawlessness will not inherit eternal life.”

There you have it, folks. Scott Roeder, a murderer, who is ignorant of the facts about abortion and the work of George Tiller, is going to be saved by Jesus, while George Tiller, who saved the lives of countless women, is going to hell. This is Christianity??

Let’s talk about a few of the stories from George Tiller’s files:

1. A 9-year-old girl who had been raped by her father. She was 18 weeks pregnant. Carrying the baby to term, going through labor and delivery, would have ripped her body apart. Dr. Tiller took her for free.

2. A New York mother who had been referred by an obstetrician to Tiller after learning, in her 27th week of pregnancy, that her soon-to-be son was “so very sick” that, once born, he’d have nothing more than “a brief life of respirators, dialysis, surgeries and pain.” In-state doctors refused to perform an abortion.

3. A woman who was referred to Dr. Tiller in her 25th week of pregnancy after finding out that her soon-to-be son had severe spina bifida and very severe hydrocephalus. He would never had understood anything about himself or the world. The would-be parents concentrated on what was best for their son. Dr. Tiller stopped their son’s heart and then induced labor. They were able to view him afterward and saw that his head was severely enlarged from the hydrocephalus.

4. A women whose soon-to-be daughter had two very severe heart defects. She was missing the chamber of her heart that fed her heart oxygen. This was causing the chamber above the missing one to swell up with the blood. Her heart was not pumping and made that chamber 2-3 times the size of her entire heart. This condition is very difficult to diagnose prior to the 20-week ultrasound because the heart just isn't big enough to see in detail. She would not have survived natural labor and would have to have been delivered via C-section. She would have to be immediately hooked to life support. She would have required a minimum of three surgeries to even enable her to take her first breath. After the surgeries her lungs would have still only been at a quarter of normal capacity and she would have been brain damaged from the lack of oxygen. They were not sure how long she would live after the surgeries. The only thing that was certain was that she would have had a very short life that would have been spent in and out of hospitals. The parents did not want to put their child through the torture of surgeries, constant hospital visits and (if she made it long enough to walk) to watch her sister run and play from the window because that is something she would never be able to do. They could also not put their other daughter through being constantly thought of second because they had a child fighting for her life only to have her taken away at a young age. They decided not to proceed with the pregnancy when the mother was 24 weeks into her pregnancy.

That is the work of Dr. George Tiller and doctors like him. It is not a case of “killing babies.” It is a case of saving the lives of the women and sparing the children from ongoing untold pain and torment. Anti-abortionists only look at saving the lives of babies, but they don’t look at what those lives would be like for the children and their families.

People like Pastor Mike and Scott Roeder disgust me. I don’t care if they wish to believe in imaginary gods, but it is wrong to enforce their beliefs onto others, particularly when they don’t know what they are talking about. Just look at the above words from Pastor Mike. He hasn’t a clue. He thinks it’s okay to kill people if your tolerance for them is too low, but it’s not okay, and therefore murder, to prevent the suffering of innocent children. That’s disgusting!

Thursday, May 28, 2009

Christian Love Vs. Same-Sex Marriage

Below you will find actual YouTube messages from loving Christians who follow the loving Jesus. These were made on the day California's Supreme Court upheld the ban on same-sex marriage: 

"oh come on now, take defeat humbly. Learn to accept me because I value my soul. However you too should value your soul more than a hole." [This is from a person who claims to be only against same sex marriage because the Bible says homosexuality is a sin. Sounds to me that he can't get past the sexual act rather than looking at marriage as a partnership. Hole???]


"I'm very glad that Prop. 8 passed!! Praise God!! No gay marriages allowed!! That means all of the gay marriages handed out a few years ago are invalid!!" [This person obviously didn't get the entire newscast. The marriages are still valid. And this is from a person we are supposed to trust to interpret the Bible correctly?]


"Homosexuals have the same rights as Heterosexuals. Neither can marry the same sex." [This is one of my favorite arguments. The old gays-are-asking-for-special-rights-because-we-all-have-the-right-to-marry-the-opposite-sex argument.]


"Gay marriage is a precursor to a violation of my rights as a Christian. Do I want my child taught in public school about married same sex couples? Thats Just the starting point of the gay agenda. Cant you see the pyramid affect it will have on society? What about all the Christian adoption agencies that closed the door in States with gay marriage fearing anti-discrimination laws? Ohhhh the pyramid affect just begins. I cant list all the negative affects it will have on society." [Yeah, look at the countries where same-sex marriage has been legal for a number of years. They're dens of iniquity. Everybody is marrying their goats. Kids are having kids. People are marrying 16 other people at once. Necrophilia abounds. Oh, the humanity!]


"You are in error. Here is why. You and I have the same exact right. We have the right to marry one, just one person of the opposite sex. It is also a wonderful coincidence that prop 8 agrees with Jesus preaching on a man shall marry a woman. Learn to value your soul my friend..more than a hole. [This guy couldn't be original. He had to repeat the old gays-are-asking-for-special-rights-because-we-all-have-the-right-to-marry-the-opposite-sex argument, as well as that "hole" thing again. They really are consumed with interest over that "hole" thing. I don't wish to point out to them that, as men, if they marry, they will also be marrying someone with a hole. Two holes actually. Maybe that's what's wrong! Not enough holes if men marry men. I dunno.]


"you faggots have been told over and over, again and again. But do you listen. NO!
Didn't think so. What makes you sick to your stomach, is the guy that dicked you in the ass last night. It's not a loss of liberty, it's a gain of "WE THE PEOPLE"." [This one was in response to someone that this guy thought was gay. Wonderful punctuation skills, don't you think?]


"Gays went from wanting a gay parade to have sex with animals in the park to having sex with dead people now to marriage. But now it's time for the extermination of these sick minded people." [Same guy that wrote the comment above this one. Can't you just feel the Christian love oozing out of this guy?]


"What is disgusting is you faggots that let a man stick you in the butt, then turn around and put it in your mouths. You are some sick minded animals." [You guessed it. Same guy as the above two quotes. Should we tell him that heterosexuals do this too?]


"Homosexuality is sin. The Word of God states so. It is such an abomination to God that He has taken dramatic action to insure we know it." [Different guy. I didn't know that God was sitting on the California Supreme Court. Did you?]


"Yes, it was a great day. Victory for us! I can't stand queers. haha" [Feel the love?]

We must keep up the fight!
Are morals and values are much superior to homosexuals, polygamist, pedophiles. Like history showes and repetes itself once again-they cannot survive, and will die out! Abominations and deveancy will never flourish in society and in healthy and robust civilizations. And if they do become rampant and widespread then that society will become extinct. Many ancient civilizations became perverse and extremely wicked- and now their gone!" [Can we say spell checker?]


"You are right! Marriage is a very sacred thing. It shouldn't be treated as a circus show.
I prayed long and hard on this. Also I don't know if you know this but New Hampsire voted too and they decided to uphold marriage between a man and a woman. So this has been a good two weeks for us (christians). And I thank God for this!! THANK GOD!!! THANK GOD!!! THANK GOD!!!" [Yeah, marriage is such a sacred thing that three-quarters of them end in divorce. But, thank God we stopped homosexuals from ruining it for us.]


"wow. you gay rights supporters sure are hostile" [Um, huh?]


Feel the love, people! Christian love for their fellow man abides. Watch out for those holes now! 

Sunday, April 19, 2009

Top 10 Signs You're a Fundamentalist Christian

I don't know where this list originated, but I wanted to pass it along. Let's just call the author Anon for now and, if I ever find out where it came from, credit will be given where credit is due. 

1. You vigorously deny the existence of thousands of gods claimed by other religions, but feel outraged when someone denies the existence of yours. 

2. You feel insulted and “dehumanized” when scientists say that people evolved from other life forms, but you have no problem with the Biblical claim that we were created from dirt. 

3. You laugh at polytheists, but you have no problem believing in a Triune God. 

4. Your face turns purple when you hear of the “atrocities” attributed to Allah, but you don’t even flinch when hearing about how God/Jehovah slaughtered all the babies of Egypt in “Exodus” and ordered the elimination of entire ethnic groups in “Joshua” including women, children, and trees! 

5. You laugh at Hindu beliefs that deify humans, and Greek claims about gods sleeping with women, but you have no problem believing that the Holy Spirit impregnated Mary, who then gave birth to a man-god who got killed, came back to life and then ascended into the sky. 

6. You are willing to spend your life looking for little loopholes in the scientifically established age of Earth (few billion years), but you find nothing wrong with believing dates recorded by Bronze Age tribesmen sitting in their tents and guessing that Earth is a few generations old. 

7. You believe that the entire population of this planet with the exception of those who share your beliefs — though excluding those in all rival sects - will spend eternity in an infinite Hell of suffering. And yet consider your religion the most “tolerant” and “loving.” 

8. While modern science, history, geology, biology, and physics have failed to convince you otherwise, some idiot rolling around on the floor speaking in “tongues” may be all the evidence you need to “prove” Christianity. 

9. You define 0.01% as a “high success rate” when it comes to answered prayers. You consider that to be evidence that prayer works. And you think that the remaining 99.99% FAILURE was simply the will of God. 

10. You actually know a lot less than many atheists and agnostics do about the Bible, Christianity, and church history - but still call yourself a Christian.

Monday, April 6, 2009

Gay Marriage is Wrong Because...So Is Incest?

I’ve been wandering through some of PastorJer777’s videos on YouTube and came across one entitled Gay Marriage is Wrong! It’s a catchy title, so I decided to hear good ol’ PastorJer’s reasons for his being against gay marriage. I figured it must have something to do with the Bible, what with Jer being a Pastor and all. I just didn’t realize that Bible stories related to hospitality and incest proved that gay marriage was wrong. Go figure, huh? I’m learning something new all the time. 

Here’s a picture of Jer. He loves driving around in his car while making his videos. He also loves hats. He even wears hats in the house while he’s making videos. Slightly weird, I know, but he does it nonetheless. 

In this video, PastorJer777 feels “inspired by the spirit to take a stand for the church concerning gay marriage.” The church should stand for what is right and gay marriage is wrong. 

Jer says, “From the beginning, it has been man and woman, not man and man or woman and woman. There is no way in the world that two men or two women can be fruitful and multiply and that is what God said to Adam and Eve in the beginning. Gay marriage is wrong. That is the truth.” 

Now, I don’t know why God told Adam and Eve that two men or two women can’t be fruitful and multiply. It’s not as if they had any choice in partners at the time. Apparently, however, it’s the truth that God told them. I think He could have held onto that speech until he created some gay people though, don’t you? 

Then, PastorJer provides some Biblical proof for his stand. “God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah for the sins of homosexuality. I want to read something to you in first Corinthians, chapter five. It says that it is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and such sexual immorality is not even named among the Gentiles. That a man has his father’s wife. Now, if Paul was hot under the collar because a man had his father’s wife, what would Paul say about two men getting married or two women getting married? I think that he would say that it’s an insult to the way that God created man and woman to be. A man was found sleeping with his mother, and Paul judged it wrong and said turn that person over to Satan for the destruction of the flesh that his spirit may be saved in the day of judgment.” 

I kid you not. Jer went from Sodom and Gomorrah, with no further explanation, into Paul sending someone to hell for incest. And this is his proof for gay marriage being wrong! I was awestruck. Aren't you awestruck? Okay, maybe it’s just me. So I wrote the following comment: 

Sodom and Gomorrah was a story about hospitality, not homosexuality. The word sodomy was not in that story until the KJV [King James Version]. Then you use a story about incest being wrong to prove that homosexuality is wrong. You're arguing apples and oranges. What I find really interesting is that you use Lot's story first, which ends in incest with his daughters (but you don't mention that), and then a different story about incest. You then equate incest with homosexuality. Your argument doesn't stand up.”

But, alas, no comment back from PastorJer777.

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Barack Hussein Obama and his Wicked Self as per LuvWorkingAtHome

LuvWorkingAtHome, so far the nastiest person I have come across on YouTube, truly has a hate-fest happening on her channel. This woman goes on and on about “evil, wicked people,” but I think she projecteth too much.

In her latest video, Obama Special Olympics Joke Comes From Liberal Heart, Luv claims to see the true Barak Hussein Obama [she never refers to him any other way when speaking his name] and what is truly in his heart. Luv shows a short clip from The Tonight Show in which Obama talks about his practicing bowling at the White House and he scored a 129. He jokingly said he’s like the Special Olympics. Now, any sane person would interpret this statement as a put-down of himself and not the people who take part in the Special Olympics. I grant he shouldn’t have said it. He grants he shouldn’t have said it. However, people misspeak all the time. Give the man a little leeway. He’s under a lot of stress.

Luv’s opinion: “There you have it, America. Our president making fun of the Special Olympics. America, we deserve better than Barack Hussein Obama. [I guess she would prefer Bush Jr, who couldn’t speak in coherent sentences with or without a teleprompter.] This man, with his wicked self and his cigarette nicotine-stained lips, sit[s] there and make[s] fun of people with disabilities, and he is supposed to be the leader of our great country.”

Had Luv researched for the truth, instead of looking for more supposed evilness, she would have found the following [I took this from Fox News because I think Fox might be more acceptable to Luv, not that it will be since she seems to hate everything unless it’s from the Bible]:

“On his way back to Washington on Air Force One, Obama called the chairman of the Special Olympics, Tim Shriver, to say he was sorry -- even before the taped program aired late Thursday night.

"He expressed his disappointed and he apologized in a way that was very moving. He expressed that he did not intend to humiliate this population," Shriver said Friday on ABC's "Good Morning America." Obama, Shriver said, wants to have some Special Olympic athletes visit the White House to bowl or play basketball.”

American has just had eight long years of the most incompetent person to ever have become president. In Luv’s videos, I don’t see any complaints of any of Bush Jr’s misspeaks, English hatchet jobs, or grammar fumbles. Obama made one bad comment for which he apologized before it was even shown on the air. Give the man a break already. He’s under so much pressure to reverse the disaster that was Bush Jr. It was one misspoken sentence. This does not make him evil. This does not make him wicked. He did not speak from his heart against people with disabilities. Good grief, woman. Lighten up.

Here’s something that might help. Well, it might not help Luv, but it makes me smile:

Favorite Bushisms:
10) "Families is where our nation finds hope, where wings take dream." —LaCrosse, Wis., Oct. 18, 2000

9) "I know how hard it is for you to put food on your family." —Greater Nashua, N.H., Jan. 27, 2000

8) "I've been in the Bible every day since I've been the president." --George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Nov. 12, 2008

7) "I know the human being and fish can coexist peacefully." —Saginaw, Mich., Sept. 29, 2000

6) "You work three jobs? … Uniquely American, isn't it? I mean, that is fantastic that you're doing that." —to a divorced mother of three, Omaha, Nebraska, Feb. 4, 2005

5) "Too many good docs are getting out of the business. Too many OB-GYNs aren't able to practice their love with women all across this country." —Poplar Bluff, Mo., Sept. 6, 2004

4) "They misunderestimated me." —Bentonville, Ark., Nov. 6, 2000

3) "Rarely is the questioned asked: Is our children learning?" —Florence, S.C., Jan. 11, 2000 [This one has always been my personal favorite.]

2) "Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." —Washington, D.C., Aug. 5, 2004

1) "There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again." —Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002

Sunday, March 22, 2009

A Logical Explanation of Noah's Flood

I know this blog is about YouTube videos, but it's my blog and I can add what I want!

I found a great theory (with pictures and everything) for the Biblical flood and the loss of Atlantis. It can be found on a blog by A-Deistic. Please see Minoan Eruption, Atlantis, Biblical Flood.

Monday, March 16, 2009

Banned From the Garden of Eden

Okay, not really. But I have been banned from TheWoodsofJordan, whose video on homosexuality I discussed yesterday. Yesterday, I said I didn’t really want to trash him. Today is another day.

So, today he uploaded a video to all YouTube atheists. I watched it because I am, after all, one of YouTube’s atheists. In this video, he accused all atheists of really believing in God, but we prefer living our wicked lives and we just say we’re atheists. Now, if one really does believe in God and his wrath and his tendency to send sinners to a burning pit for all eternity, do you think that one would really deny He Who Must Be Adored At All Times? I don’t think so.

Jordan (let’s call him that ‘cause its shorter) then accused all of YouTube’s atheists of going around rating Christians’ videos with 1 star, without watching them, and then leaving hate-filled and angry comments on the videos. I’m not going to say that there aren’t some atheists who do this, but I know I’m not one of them. Jordan then, for all intents and purposes, dared atheists to NOT give him a 1-star rating. This video was really all about his ratings and that was all he was whining about when he responded to people’s comments. And this after just uploading another video in which he told everyone that nothing, and he meant nothing, should come before God. Well, clearly, dear Jordan has placed his ratings above God.

He also asked us why his videos would bother us. He is only providing his beliefs after all. Can’t we all just get along? (He actually said that.) Well, apparently, we can’t all just get along because I was banned for leaving a comment. It wasn’t hate-filled and it wasn’t angry. I admit I said I was getting somewhat pissed off with him, but that’s hardly angry. My comment was:

“The first of your videos I've ever watched was Homosexuality is a Sin and I am fairly sure that I didn't rate it at all. So, that theory of yours is shot. In fact, I thought you were a rather peaceful guy. Now, however, after continually ignoring my legitimate question regarding proof, I'm kind of pissed off with you, but I still haven't rated your videos. Now, you claim to know the minds of atheists better than we do. No, I don't know there is a God and neither do you; otherwise you'd prove it.”

To which he responded:

“It's a 3 star average, that means quite a few atheists have rated it 1 thus far, proving my point.”

So you see, he ignored everything else I said and focused on the rating, even though I had told him I had not rated his videos. Oh, God is going to be so angry at Jordan for putting his ratings above Him. Better pray extra-hard tonight, dear boy. You’re staring damnation in the face.

I then tried to post a response, which was:

"Did you even read what I wrote? This video was addressed to all YouTube atheists. That includes me. I said I have not rated your videos, so your point has been falsified. Not all atheists do what you are accusing them of. You ask how is speaking of your beliefs affecting me. Well, you've called me an abomination and a sinner, which I disagree with. You've also accused me of rating Christian videos and commenting out of hatred. You're wrong and you can't even acknowledge that."

But, alas, I had been banned.

What is it with these Christians that they can’t handle any kind of dissent or disagreement? That’s a rhetorical question, by the way. It seems fine to them that they can accuse others of being sinners, abominations, dishonest, hate-filled, etc. etc. But try to defend yourself and you’re banned. Something seems familiar about this situation. What could it be? Oh yeah. The Garden of Eden. They’re acting like God when Adam and Eve ate from the Tree of Knowledge. Ya can’t get too smart, ya know, asking questions ‘n all. I’ve been unceremoniously chucked by a God-wannabe-thingie. Oh well, I’d rather have the knowledge. Apple anyone?

Darwin vs Adam & Eve

This is a great video which explains the real reason behind the creationists' fight against Darwin. Evolution = No Adam & Steve = No original sin = No need for the church. Enjoy!

Sunday, March 15, 2009

Homosexuality is a Sin. Honest - It Says So In A Very Old Book

I got involved in what passed for a discussion on a video entitled “Homosexuality is a Sin” by TheWoodsofJordan. I like this fellow’s name, by the way; it’s a peaceful sounding name. Not so “inyourface” as some Christian YouTube user names can be. He also seems like a peaceful individual, so I don’t want to trash him really. However, what happened in this discussion (or lack thereof) just calls out for me to write about it.

His video starts like this:

“I want to talk about a controversial issue in the Christian community and the world really, and that is homosexuality, and homosexuality is a sin. Now, many people out there are going to be quick to jump on this video and say, ‘You’re a bigot, you’re a racist, you’re homophobic,’ and it has nothing to do with that. God strictly says in the Bible that homosexuality is a sin and, in fact, it’s actually an abomination. If you go to Leviticus, chapter 18, and in verse 22, it says ‘You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination.’ Clearly stated. If you just turn over a few pages in your Bible ‘til Leviticus, chapter 20, and read verse 13, it says, ‘If a man,’ and remember this is back in the Old Testament days when people were under the law and remember, we are no longer under the law. We are under the grace of Jesus Christ because he died for our sins. So, no longer are people treated this way, but nonetheless, it is still a sin. Leviticus 20:13 says, ‘If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them.’ So that was back in the Old Testament under the law when God was a lot more strict and his wrath really showed upon people. Not to say that God still isn’t strict and God doesn’t pour out judgment upon people, because he does, but God decided that since no one could follow all of these laws and commandments and stuff, that He would have to send the ultimate sacrifice, which was Jesus Christ, to die for all of our sins.”

He then goes into a couple of verses in the New Testament, but I won’t bore you with those. I think you’ve got the general idea that the Bible claims that homosexuality is an abomination and a sin. So, here’s my comment posted on his video:

“Before you can convince anyone of anything by quoting from the bible, you're going to have to do 2 things:

1. Prove that God exists.
2. Prove that the bible is the word of God.

Until you can prove those two things, then your quotations are meaningless.”

Within a couple of minutes, I get a response, not from TheWoodsofJordan, but someone with the oxymoronic name of VersatileMind4Christ, who says:

“LOL You're on the wrong video then. Off topic.
Before you comment on this video. You must realize this video is targeted to people who believe in the Bible, people in the Christian community OR ANYONE who is curious to learn about the Bible.
The purpose of this video is to provide explanations of the topic of homosexuality in context to the doctrine of the Bible.
In the beginning of the video he CLEARLY says "Christian Community" and the world. LOL”

My mind said “Huh? What did she (VersatileMind) hear that I missed?” So I listened to the beginning again. He said exactly what I’ve quoted above and there is no way I can interpret that to mean his target audience was only the Christian community or anyone curious about the Bible. Besides, I thought my comment did fall within curiosity about the Bible. So I responded with:

“He says he wants to talk about a controversial issue in the Christian community and the world. How does that leave me out?”

Oxymoronic counters with:

“Exactly. If part of his target market or demographic is the Christian community. why would he have to PROVE God's existence?
Now on the "world" aspect, this video provides an explanation on homosexuality in the Bible.
It is not to prove God, it is a simple discussion. You commented a bit rude and off topic.
If you wanted a video to discuss God's existence then you need to go to a video from a youtuber on that subject.”

Well, to make this easier, here is the rest of the conversation:

Why is that? If someone is going to call people I care about sinners and abominations, I have the right to comment.

Yes you do have a right to voice your opinion. It is the manner you did it that was a bit disrespectful distracted from the point of the video.
Do you understand what an abomination is?
This is always misunderstood.

Please don't speak down to me. I am not stupid. Nor am I disrespectful. In my opinion, all of your "lol's" are disrespectful.

Okay. Sorry for the "lols" I acknowledge that.
On such a touchy subject people are quick to show hate towards someone simply sharing their views.
The same freedom you have to voice your opinion to others, so does he to express that homosexuality is a sin.

"people are quick to show hate"

Are you referring to yourself or to me with this statement? I am not feeling any hatred, so if you are referring to me, you need to stop assuming.
I agree that people have freedom to voice their opinions, but that doesn't mean that others don't have the right to voice their opposition to those opinions. That is all I'm doing. I'm not hating anyone.

You're MISSING the complete purpose of this conversation. Please read my comments again.
IF you're going voice opposition, do it ON TOPIC and not rude.

Again, I'm not being rude. Why is it off topic to ask someone to prove that the source of their opinions is legit? In my mind, that is totally on topic. You may not like it, but it is on topic.

Again...If you wanted a video to discuss God's existence then you need to go to a video from a youtuber on that subject.
Thanks for keeping this respectful. I'm done here.

I'm sorry that you feel you're done here. I will add, however, that I was not looking for any particular subject. I simply came upon this video and watched it. I then questioned the validity of this user's sources. He's making the claims. I would like some proof of his claims.

You are asking us to prove God. This video isn't about proving God. It's about how homosexuality is a sin. If you are going to discuss something, make sure it relates to the video at least.

I'm sorry, but I don't see how my questions are not related to the video. Your contention is that homosexuality is a sin and you're providing God and the bible as the sources of your opinions. I'm asking you to provide proof that your sources are legit. If these sources cannot be proven as legit, then why should I believe that homosexuality is a sin? I'm not trying to be argumentative for argument's sake. I'm trying to understand the legitimacy of your sources.

Thank you Jordan. My point exactly! LOL
This video isn't about proving God. It's not that difficult to understand.

Just the typically argument. I am really surprised, not as much hatred as I thought.

Also "people" refers to others in general. If I wanted to say YOU directly, I would have.
So I wasn't assuming and I wasn't talking about you directly.

But you were responding directly to me, so why all of a sudden refer to people in general?

Jordan, this is your wording in the description box:

This video is talking about homosexuality and how it is a sin in God's eyes. I do not hate homosexuals, but they need to recognize that what they are doing is a sin, and that they were not born this way but rather chose to be this way.

So I'm asking - why should homosexuals recognize what you're claiming if you will not back up your claims? Why did you make the video and the above statements if you refuse to discuss it? Back up your claims.


This is somewhat of a long blog entry, but in case anyone is reading this, I wanted you to see the weirdness of the comments. So far, TheWoodsofJordan has not acknowledged by questions further. What I don’t understand is why don’t they get it? Why don’t they see that asking for proof of the legitimacy of the sources used is quite on topic? I know that they can’t provide the proof, but asking for it is still on topic. I guess they expect that homosexuals are just supposed to watch this video and say, “Yep, you’re right. I’ve been living a sinful life. I’m giving it all up because that 2000-year-old book that you said is the word of God says so. Good enough for me.”

Pardon me for using my brain to think and question! Is that a sin as well? I wonder sometimes because using their brains doesn’t seem to be something that these extra-religious people do.

Sunday, March 1, 2009

Does God Love Everyone? BibleOrTraditions

I came across this video on bibleortraditions' channel on YouTube. I’ve since discovered that it can also be found on other channels, but since I found it on bibleortraditions’ channel first, I am basing this entry on my experience there. On this particular channel, the comments section is not disabled, but it is moderated. Needless to say, my comment was not accepted. Okay, so here we go.

Does God Love Everyone is a video of a supposed theological scholar answering the question posed in the video’s title. His first bitch is that the question is the totally wrong thing to ask. Dr. Robert A. Morey claims the question is “very shallow, very inept, not really thought through.” He claims the question should be “Does the bible anywhere teach that God loves every human being from Adam to the last human being ever born or does the bible teach that God hates some people, as well as loves some other people?” and “Are we ever told in the bible that God loves anybody? I mean why assume that he should or not. Matter of fact, looking around, I would think God should hate everybody. If he loves anybody, that’s a shock. No one deserves the love of God. Nobody.”

Then he opens his bible to Romans 9:13 “Jacob I loved,. . .” So, apparently the bible does state that God loved a specific person. Now, does he state that he hates anyone? Yes, same verse “. . . but Esau I hated.” Dr. Morey then rationalizes that there are two classes of people. One is worthy of God’s love and one worthy of his hate. Well, isn’t that special!

He then moves on to the Gospel of John and Morey states, “We go to Jesus Christ, who, of course, was the son of love.” [I found that last bit extremely ironic.] John 3:36 “He who believes in the Son has eternal life; but he who does not obey the Son will not see life, but the wrath of God continues to abide on him.” This, you see, is the proof for two classes of people. There are those who God is no longer angry with because they believe in Jesus, but the non-believers are exposed to God’s anger and wrath. Morey continues, “Right from the book of Genesis all the way through the book of Revelation, you have two groups of people. God is angry with sinners.” My question? Why did God create sin if he wanted us to be so darned perfect in order to be loved? He set us up to fail and then hates us for doing so. Nice guy, this God!

There’s more to the video than this, but I can’t stomach listening to it any further, and it’s not really all that important anyway. My unacceptable comment was the following:

At best, the bible is hearsay, which any clear thinking person would never accept as truth. At worst, the bible is a book of collective myths, which any clear thinking person would never accept as truth.

I said this because Dr. Morey’s quotes are just that – they are either hearsay (Romans was written by Paul somewhere around 51 A.D. and the Gospel of John was written decades after that) or they are simply folklore. In the 21st Century, don’t you think we should be basing our lives on reality rather than hearsay or folklore? Is it not time we got over the ignorant explanations of ignorant people?

Saturday, February 28, 2009

Obama Thanks Satan – Strange, but True! – according to LuvWorkingAtHome

Oh my goodness, it’s “Paul is dead” all over again. For those who are old enough, remember the rumors about playing a particular Beatles' song backwards and hearing that Paul was dead? Well, here we go again! Only now, the theory goes that Barack Obama is a satan worshipper and, if you play his “Yes we can” speeches backwards, he is clearly saying “Thank you satan.”

LuvWorkingAtHome, who has disabled her comment section on YouTube and also refuses to respond to anyone who doesn’t agree with her, has a new video out that demonstrates the evilness of Obama, according to her. She has taken a couple of videos in which he says “Yes we can” and recorded them with her Windows Sound Recorder. Then she plays them in reverse so we all can hear the devil worship, “Thank you satan” coming from Obama’s mouth.

Now, here’s the thing. If she would look at this situation logically, which is an impossibility for Luv, she’d realize that you cannot get “Thank you satan” from the reverse sounds of “Yes we can.” Backwards, it becomes “nac ew sey” by just spelling alone. Now, let’s add the pronunciation.

“Nac” is pronounced just as you see it. In some places in the video, “can” is extended a little, so it’s comes out “caaan” or, in reverse, “naaac.” “We” does sound like “you” in reverse. The word “yes” is a little problematic in that it does sound like “ee-yes,” particularly in the videos that Luv has chosen. So, backwards, it sounds like “sey-ee.” Altogether, we’ve got “Nac you seyee” or “Naaac you seyee.” Without looking at Luv’s cues that popped up everytime the suspect phrase is uttered, I simply heard “Nac you seyee,” which is a far cry from “Thank you satan.” You have to really want to hear “Thank you satan” in order to hear it.

I’m not sure why Luv dislikes Obama so much. My working theory is that he’s more popular than Jesus is right now and she can’t deal with that. Hence, Obama must be in league with the devil. Oh well - Long live Paul! Long live Obama! Yes we can! And nac you seyee! Hmm, isn’t that some form of Elvish?

Sunday, February 22, 2009

YouTube and the Users

For those of you who know Thunderf00t (if there is anyone out there reading this), he has been suspended from YouTube for 2 weeks for uploading this video. His video was removed as a "violation of the guidelines." No one knows which guideline he supposedly violated. In any event, to add my support, here is the video, mirrored by dprjones.

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

CAD - Dastardly Stubborn Mean IV Revised

Is Gay a Gift From God?

According to EPP706 on YouTube, the answer is no. EPP is right, but for the wrong reason. There is no God. Being gay cannot be a gift from something that does not exist. However, let’s examine EPP’s reasoning, shall we?

EPP heads straight (excuse the pun) to the Bible verses that state that homosexuality is an abomination. But wait, she then states that “everyone that is born is truly a gift from God.” Hmm, maybe she thinks gays are hatched? No, she then states “What an individual does and the choices that he or she makes, now, that’s another story. That’s a whole totally different thing.” Here comes the best part, “If gay is a gift from God, then I look at it like this – murderers, rapists, molesters, robbers, thieves, they are gifts from God too. All of these individuals have one thing in common, and that is choice. All of these individuals also have another thing in common, and that is that they are being controlled by evil, demonic, diabolical spirits. Well, people who are gay chose to be gay. They chose to be gay. And some will debate me on that and say, oh, they were born that way. I don’t believe that. I never have and I never will. No little baby comes into this world saying I’m going to be gay when I grow up.” 

Well, there are a number of problems that I can see here. 

1. Everyone is a gift from God, but only if one doesn’t choose that which EPP does not agree. I mean, according to the Bible, God thought many things were abominations, but I bet you EPP wears leather and clothes woven with more than one type of fiber. She’s probably against slavery, which God and Jesus condoned. 

2. Providing no proof at all, EPP opines that being gay is a choice, and she will never waiver on this. How very open-minded of her. 

3. Gays, who harm no one, are no different than murderers, rapists, molesters, and thieves, who do harm others. Does anyone else find this as offensive as I do? 

4. There are no evil, demonic, diabolical spirits, just like there is no God. There are, however, evil diabolical people. Some religious people come to mind – not all, but some. 

5. Gay people can tell EPP what it is like to be gay. They can explain that they were born that way. Apparently, EPP knows better. She knows it’s a choice. She offers no proof though. 

6. “No little baby comes into this world saying I’m going to be gay when I grow up.” Well, they wouldn’t, would they? That would make it a choice on their part, which it isn’t. Basically, by trying to be smart, EPP tripped over her own thoughts. 

Okay, basically, I responded in EPP’s comment section as best I could within the 500 characters allowed, but I’ve received no response. No surprises there. I finally looked back at the previous comments and found the following comments by EPP706:

“Homosexuality is not natural. Sodomy is not natural. The rectum was not made for a penis to enter, only for waste to exit. That in itself is enough to know that it is not natural. 
I'm not hear to prove anything only to speak the truth. There is a big difference in people loving others and then people engaging in sexual behavior that is simply not natural.” 

I guess no one told EPP that heterosexuals can also perform sodomy and that gays can do other things than sodomy. And does this mean that lesbianism is okay? It’s not really possible to perform sodomy unless they use a contraption of some sort, which I don’t think most do. I could be wrong here. I’m sure EPP will educate me with her vast knowledge on the subject, if she ever reads this. Also note, she’s not hear [sic] to prove anything, only to speak the truth. How does she know the truth without actually researching anything beyond the Bible? 

In response to someone stating: Can you not see your bigotry here? No one chooses to be born gay, no one chooses to be born Black, and neither category says anything about a person's character. But racists and homophobes both use the Bible to prove that gays and Blacks are bad, as they did with slavery.

EPP wrote: “Please, don't compare being born black to being born gay, there is NO comparison. Being Gay is definitely NOT the new black and I am appalled that people have the audacity to compare being born black to being gay. I did not choose to be black and I could never change my skin color, even if I tried, it is in my DNA, but a gay person can always change and turn from the homosexual lifestyle. Enough said! 

She’s appalled, ladies and gentlemen, at the audacity of the questioner to compare being born gay to being born black. However, EPP is quite comfortable in equating gays to murderers, rapists, molesters, and thieves. I so love the hypocrisy of it! Pot, kettle, black (no pun intended). 

Monday, February 16, 2009

Christian Hypocrisy

LuvWorkingAtHome has a new video up entitled “Being Called Uncle Tom Is a Compliment.” Luv has now read “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” by Harriet Beecher Stowe and is full of praise of the book. Let me be clear right now that I, for once, happen to agree with Luv. However, what I find truly fascinating is her statement, “This book raised the awareness of the cruelty and evil of slavery.” Again, while I agree with Luv’s statement, she does not seem to realize the hypocrisy of it when one considers many of Luv’s other videos. 

Here’s an example. In her video “Elizabeth Hasselbeck Phony Christian & Star Parker Schools View on Biblical Family,” Luv ranted on about Elizabeth Hasselbeck not defending Star Parker’s views about same-sex marriage (she’s against it – surprise!). Elizabeth said she struggled with this issue because the Bible says that you love God, but you also love your neighbor. Luv chastised Elizabeth for not quoting the scriptures accurately. 

Luv states:

“You love God with all your heart, soul, mind, and body, and then you love your neighbor as yourself. You love God first though. You listen to what he said, what his opinion is, what his position on the issue is. God said homosexuality is an abomination to him. You cannot go contrary to that. You love God by following his ways. His ways are supposed to be your ways. You follow him.” 

So the first time I am somewhat proud of Elizabeth, it turns out she’s being a bad Christian, according to Luv. Go figure! However, I digress. The point I’m making is that, for LuvWorkingAtHome, the words of her ever precious Bible and God are totally accurate and should be followed where they suit Luv’s prejudices and bigotry. However, nowhere in the Bible does it condemn slavery. Nowhere does it say that slavery is evil. In fact, both God and Jesus condone slavery from one end of the book to the other. But because slavery is something that Luv is strongly against, regardless of the Bible, slavery is evil. This is called cherry picking, Luv. 

Slavery was established by decree of Almighty God. It is sanctioned in the Bible, in both Testaments, from Genesis to Revelation - - Jefferson Davis     

Thursday, February 12, 2009

Christian Refuses to Post Refutation Comment

On YouTube, TheJarredJammer posted a video entitled "BREAKING NEWS - Intelligent Design Wins" The content of the video is irrelevant here, but I noticed that NephilimFree had left one of his totally inaccurate comments in which he stated the following:

I've seen a brain surgeon say it's 01^950. Either way, it destroys evolutionism [His word, not mine.]
Also 80% of the protiens [his spelling, not mine] in humans are NOT found in apes.

I wanted to post the following, which I got from Biomedicine

"Chimps and people share almost 99 percent of the non-duplicated sequences of their genomes; their proteins are virtually identical; and there are very few rearrangements that distinguish ape-human chromosomes."

Well, TheJarredJammer has his comments on moderation and, lo and behold, my comment has not been put through.

I thought these religious people are supposed to be honest. I guess honesty is in the eye of the beholder. If it doesn't fit within their framework of non-facts, it doesn't get posted.

Monday, February 9, 2009

Christian Honesty

A Self Challenge for Evolutionists

NephilimFree is one of the most boring creationists on YouTube. He claims to have been an atheist at one time, but after researching and studying lots of information, he came to the conclusion that only the Christian God could have created the universe. But that’s another story for another time.

In this particular video, entitled “A Self Challenge for Evolutionists,” NephilimFree begins by stating, “So, you believe in evolution. Right? You believe that science provides evidence of evolution. You believe that evolutionist scientists or those people who put forth this evidence, and that the evidence they put forth is correct, it’s accurate, and it describes this world. You believe they’re trustworthy. You believe they’re honest. You believe what they say. This is why you believe in evolution? Is it? Is it because of science? Is it because of evidence in science? Is it because you believe that evolutionist scientists are honest? I have a challenge for you. It requires only that you examine what you believe and see if you truly do believe it. And why, why do you believe it? I’m going to show you a little video clip.” NephilimFree then blithers on, repeating the same thing for minutes. Then he asks, “If I could show you evidence, proof positive, that what you’re told about this creature, afarensis [Lucy], is forgery, academic fraud, and hoaxery [his word, not mine], would you still believe that it’s an ancestor of human beings? And how would this effect what you think is evidence for evolution in other fields of science? How much of that evidence that you believe in, you put your faith in, would you still consider to be scientific or factual? Be honest with yourself. If you can’t be honest with yourself ever again the rest of your life, be honest with yourself when you watch this because many of you are going to be picking your jaws up off the floor. I promise you.” More blither for minutes. I’m beginning to shout, “just show me the video already!”

Now, we finally get to it. And it’s a video from, which is the first clue that I’m not going to pass NephilimFree’s challenge. Or maybe I’ll pass, but good ol’ boring Neph is the one who failed. So, I tell myself to keep an open mind. You never know what might happen. The video is about Lucy’s hip and the fact that the hip is wrong for a bipedal creature. I find myself watching a video within a video within a video. Neph’s video includes a video of a presentation of Lucy’s hip in which they show a video of Dr. Owen Lovejoy explaining why Lucy’s hip is wrong. He explains that the hip had been broken in many pieces but, during the fossilization process, the hip fused together incorrectly. Many titters from the answersingenesis’ audience. Lovejoy then goes on to explain that, with the hip the way it was, it could not have moved as an ape or a human. Logic should tell this audience and Neph that this means the hip is in incorrect alignment. But no, they just think it’s funny and believe that Lovejoy is simply trying to pull the wool over everyone’s eyes. Lovejoy makes a copy, in plaster, of the hip and then reams the edges down with a power sander, which answersingenesis claims to be a power saw. More titters from the audience. He then puts the plaster hip together in the way the pieces would have been had the bones not been broken. It becomes more of a human hip. Titter, guffaw!!

Well, I asked myself, is my faith in science and evolution shattered? Neph said it would be. Maybe I’ll do some more research before I give up my sanity and move over to the creationist’s side. And here’s what I found:

This article explains, in full, the problem with Lucy’s hip and how it was solved. Pictures, diagrams, and everything.

Since I couldn’t put a comment on Neph’s video (he’s disabled that), I sent him a personal message stating that I had taken the challenge and I wasn’t convinced of his proof. I provided him with the above URL but, alas, I heard nothing in return. Didn’t think I would.

Neph, my boring friend, if you want to convince an evolutionist, you’re going to have to come up with something that isn’t from a creationist website. Your claim is that scientists distort the facts to match their hypotheses, yet from what you’ve shown in this video, it is the creationists who clearly distorted the facts.

Oh, and one more thing, Neph. If you are going to continue making such long videos showing only your face, you really need to liven up some. You've got a face like a wet weekend. It's depressing.

Sunday, February 8, 2009

Why is Obama Evil? I Really Want to Know

A couple of months ago, I came across this video entitled “Obama Is Not For God, He Is Not Chosen Of God” by LuvWorkingAtHome. I'm not going to link to it because, well, quite frankly, it would disgust me that I provided her site with traffic. The picture showing for this video was Hitler, which intrigued me. I have never been an Obama fan (Hillary supporter here), but I’ve never considered him anything like Hitler. Being curious, I watched the video. Luv claims to have made the video because so many people were writing to her and saying that God chose Obama as president and, therefore, nobody should say anything against him. Here are Luv’s assertions:

1. Luv disagrees that “God elected Barack Hussein Obama. The ones who elected him are wicked people, ignorant people, and phony Christians.”

2. “I don’t think that Barack Hussein Obama is eligible to be president because he is not a natural born citizen.”

3.”Barack Hussein Obama is an evil wicked man. He is for the things that God said is an abomination. He is for the shedding of innocent blood, for abortion. He is for homosexual rights and homosexual marriages.”

4. “God has a permissive will in which he will allow us to make choices. He is not going to force us to choose good or force us to choose evil. He has given us a free will.” She then quotes some verse from the bible that the Lord is “not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.” She then goes on “It’s not His will that people should go to hell, but they’re going, and He didn’t do it.”

5. “I think a lot of people should be careful of what they try to blame on God.”

6. Then she shoots up a picture of Hitler and asks, “Are we not supposed to oppose a Nazi Germany or a Adolf Hitler or a communist murderer like Joseph Stalin?”

Okay, so I’m not curious any more. Now I’m angry. Since she has disabled any comments from being placed on her video, I sent her a personal message. I don’t think I was mean about it. I asked for clarification on some points. My message:

First off, I'd like to state that I'm not an Obama fan, but neither was I a McCain fan. Having said that, I'm curious as to how you can equate Obama with Hitler and Stalin. He is nothing like them. How is Obama evil and wicked? Personally, I think he's all talk and no substance, but that doesn't make him evil or wicked.

What proof do you have that only wicked, ignorant, and phony Christians voted for Obama? Since he got the majority of the votes, are you saying that the majority of Americans are not good people?

Also, where are you getting this fact that Obama is not a natural born citizen? He was born in Hawaii and that is a state of the U.S., is it not? And why do you constantly refer to him by his full name, Barack Hussein Obama? Are you trying to emphasize the "Hussein" part? For what purpose?

I know you can say what you like in your videos within the guidelines of Youtube, but your videos would go a lot further if you backed up your assertions with some proof. You advocate questioning leaders and I agree with you on that, but when you make videos to educate people, you are acting as a leader to some extent. How are people to question you if you prevent comments from being posted on your videos? You seem to have strong convictions and I'm sure you feel you can back them up, so why not allow some discussion to take place. More education happens with two-way discussion than a lecture, wouldn't you agree? I do realize that there are a lot of trolls out there ready to trash any video that gets posted, which may be your reason, but learning by discussion is far more important that worrying about the trolls. They can always be ignored.

Thanks for the video. I don't really agree with much of what you've said, but you made me think nonetheless. I hope you will be good enough to respond to my above questions. I'm always curious about people's thoughts, ideas, and feelings. :)

And did I get a response? Of course not. She hasn’t got the gumption to back up her assertions. Oh it’s easy to say that Obama is evil and wicked and Hitler-like, etc., but proof is a far more difficult thing to provide. It’s easy to say that Obama is not a natural born citizen, but far harder to back it up.

After watching this video again, I have some further questions and concerns. Why is abortion so wrong, but it was okay for God to kill innocent people when it suited him? Does that strike anybody as a loving God? Where does it say in the Bible that abortion is a sin? Actually, abortion is never mentioned in the Bible, yet there are some verses that Christians try to interpret as being about abortion.

If Luv is going to pick out from the Bible that homosexuality is an abomination, I certainly hope that she never wears pants or her husband’s shirts (wearing the clothes of the opposite sex is an abomination). I hope she never eats shellfish (eating seafood that does not have scales is an abomination). Luv better not eat any rare meat (eating meat that still has blood is an abomination). And I certainly hope that she doesn’t ever wear clothes with blended materials (another abomination!).

I’m not even going to go into the free will crap!! Suffice it to say that if God wanted us to always be good, He shouldn’t have created evil. He was responsible for the creation of everything, was He not? It’s like putting a candy in a child’s playpen and demanding that he not touch it. Of course the kid is going to touch it.

God is a man-made creation, not the other way around. When Luv proclaims that people should be careful what they blame on God, I think that holds for the religious people as well. Luv, you use God to instill your hatred. You use God to hate homosexuals. You use God to hate whatever is not of your desires. I get that you don’t like Obama. That’s fine. But this video is nothing but hate-spewing garbage that you cannot back up with facts. Using an ancient book, written by man, is not proof of anything except your lack of logical thought processes.